State v. Harry
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
*100OPINION
McHUGH, Judge:
T1 Defendant Russell David Harry appeals his conviction for possession or use of a controlled substance, a third degree felony, see Utah Code Ann. § 58-37-8(2)(a)() (Supp. 2005). Harry argues that the trial court erred when it delivered a modified Allen instruction to a deadlocked jury. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse his felony possession conviction and remand for a new trial.
BACKGROUND1
T2 Around midnight on September 16, 2005, Utah Highway Patrol Officer Jared Garcia stopped the car driven by Harry when he noticed a cracked windshield, no front license plate, and an…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Lowenfield v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Brasfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Jenkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- People v. GainerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CruzCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- State v. DaltonCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. GinterCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- Salt Lake City v. AlmansorCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.