Harter v. Shull
Colorado Court of Appeals
Appeal from the County Court of Logan County.
1Opinion of the CourtThomson, J.
■ The complaint in this cause, filed on the 14th’ day of December, 1898, alleged that on the 8th day of November, 1897, the appellees recovered judgment against the appellant on a promissory note made by him, in the district court of Sac county, Iowa, which court had full and complete jurisdiction in the cause, and thát no part of the judgment had been paid. Judgment was demanded for the amount of the Iowa judgment and costs.
The defendant answered denying that he was indebted to the plaintiffs in any sum; and alleging that the obligation upon which the judgment was recovered had been paid…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. ThrockmortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Roath v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1850
- Hallack v. LoftSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893
- Dunlap v. ByersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Brown v. TuckerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kavanagh v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1912
- McKinney v. AdamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1909
- White v. AinsworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1917
- Burns v. National Mining, Tunnel & Land Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1913
- McLeod v. Provident Mutual Life Insurance Co. of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.