Legal Opinion

Harden v. Mead Johnson & Company, LLC

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided June 7, 2024No. 1:24-cv-00108Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION Dion Harden, individually and on behalf of M.H., a minor, et al., Plaintiffs, No. 24 CV 108 v. Judge Lindsay C. Jenkins Mead Johnson & Company, LLC, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant Mead Johnson & Company, LLC (“Mead Johnson”)1 manufactures infant formula, including Enfamil-brand Nutramigen Powder. [Dkt. 1 ¶¶ 1–2.] On December 30, 2023, Mead Johnson recalled Nutramigen products sold in the United States because of possible contamination with Chronobacter sakazakii, a harmful bacterium. [Id. ¶¶…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Daimler AG v. BaumanSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  4. Hertz Corp. v. FriendSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., San Francisco Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API