Legal Opinion
Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLC
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 16, 2013No. Civil Action No. 12-336 (RWR)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Pro se plaintiff Araya Henok brings this action against Chase Home Finance, LLC (“Chase”), Shapiro & Burson, LLP (“Shapiro”), and Fannie Mae1, challenging the legality of the foreclosure on a property he owned on 16th Street N.E. in Washington, D.C. (“the property”). After the defendants moved for judgment on the plead*166ings arguing that Henok’s complaint failed to satisfy the pleading requirements under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8 and failed to state a claim for relief under Rule 12, Henok moved for leave to amend the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Busby v. Capital One, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Robinson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Henok v. Chase Home Finance, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- E.M. v. Shady Grove Reproductive Science Center P.C.District Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Goddard v. City University of SeattleDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.