Legal Opinion

Richard Kaschak v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 26, 1983No. 81-3383PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NATHANIEL R. JONES, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant, Richard Kaschak, appeals from an order of the district court dismissing the complaint against his employer, Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court found that the National Railroad Adjustment Board (the Board) had exclusive jurisdiction over the dispute which gave rise to this action and, thus, that Kaschak’s resort to the federal courts was improper. We find that, although the resolution of minor disputes generally lies within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Board, the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Robert T. Sisco v. Consolidated Rail Corp. And United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Reginald Childs v. Pennsylvania Federation Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employees, and National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  3. Michael Emswiler v. CSX Transportation Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. DeTomaso v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Joseph C. Stephens v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company, a Virginia Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API