Legal Opinion

In Re Albertson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

No question is made as to the right of appeal, the statute providing that in all cases of habeas corpus where a contest arises in respect to the custody of minor children, either party may appeal to the Supreme Court from the final judgment. C. S., 2242; Stokes v. Cogdell, 153 N. C., 181.

In bis answer to tbe petition for tbe writ tbe respondent alleges tbat after tbe deed of separation was executed be was granted a decree by wbicb tbe marriage relation between tbe petitioner and bimself was dissolved; and at tbe bearing be introduced without objection a written instrument purporting to be a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re BlakeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  2. Stokes v. . CogdellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hinkle v. HinkleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Story v. . StorySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Blankenship v. BlankenshipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Gafford v. PhelpsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. Phipps v. . VannoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API