Legal Opinion
State v. Valdes
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 31, 1996No. 96-162PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
677 So.2d 107 (1996)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Jorge L. VALDES, Appellee.
No. 96-162.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
July 31, 1996.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Linda S. Katz, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Harvey J. Sepler, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Before GODERICH, GREEN and FLETCHER, JJ.
2Per curiam
Because the State failed to make a contemporaneous objection on the basis that the evidence presented at the sentencing hearing was insufficient under the Barbera[1]-Herrin[2] rule, the State did not…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- Barbera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Herrin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- State v. RodriguezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
4Cited by7 opinions
- State v. HenriquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. BoddenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. D.S.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
- State v. FranklinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. HendonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.