Legal Opinion
State v. Rodriguez
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 15, 1996No. 96-358PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
673 So.2d 187 (1996)
The STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Pedro RODRIGUEZ, Appellee.
No. 96-358.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
May 15, 1996.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General and Sandra S. Jaggard, Assistant Attorney General, for appellant.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Howard K. Blumberg, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee.
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GERSTEN and FLETCHER, JJ.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
While the evidence presented at the sentencing hearing was arguablythough curablyinsufficient under the Barbera[1]-Herrin[2] rule, compare State v. Gordon, 645…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barbera v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1987
- Herrin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- State v. HintonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
- Pinder v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- State v. PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HenriquezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. ValdesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- State v. WoodsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
- State v. BoddenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
- State v. D.S.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.