Legal Opinion

Budorick v. Budorick

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 22, 2019No. 1:19-cv-03957Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION DANIEL E. BUDORICK, Appellant, Case No. 19 C 3957 v. Judge Harry D. Leinenweber HEATHER BUDORICK, MARLIYN MANERI, VINCENT MANERI and HOLLISTER INCORPORATED, Appellees. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This is an appeal of three Orders the Bankruptcy Court issued in the course of Daniel Burdock’s Chapter 13 bankruptcy proceedings. For the reasons stated herein, the judgment of the Bankruptcy Court is affirmed. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Daniel Budorick (“Daniel”) appeals three Orders issued in his bankruptcy…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Law v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. McClellan v. CarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. In the Matter of Daniel J. YONIKUS and Carolyn S. Yonikus, Debtors. Appeal of Daniel J. YONIKUSCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
  5. Sykes v. Cook County Circuit Court Probate DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API