Legal Opinion

Pridgen v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1950No. 5304PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

UDALL, Justice.

Petitioners, Elinor K. Pridgen and Deana Jo Pridgen, made application to The Industrial Commission of Arizona for compensation on account of the death of their husband and father, Joseph C. Pridgen. The latter, who was of the age of 29 years, met his death as the result of an accident on July 18, 1949. The decedent was then, and for some time previously had been, in the employ of respondents Wm. Fitchett and Eula Rebecca Fitchett, his wife, who were doing business in the City of Tucson under the trade-name of the Arizona Glass & Mirror Co. The respondent commission was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Stakonis v. United Advertising CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. O'Rourke v. Percy Vittum Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  5. Tooley v. WeisbarthArizona Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ramseth v. Maycock & State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Indiana Toll Road Commission v. BartuschIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. Keene v. InsleyCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Cooper v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Fremont Indem. Co. v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API