Saiz v. Horn
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] This is an action brought by hom-ebuyers against their realtor. After their purchase, the buyers found that the home they bought had substantial defects. They also learned that the seller had previously given other potential buyers a disclosure statement revealing these defects. The buyers sued their realtor for breach of agency and breach of fiduciary duty in failing to inform them that the seller had a statutory duty to provide them with a disclosure statement. The trial court granted summary judgment for the realtor, finding no duty on the part of the buyers’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Fisher v. KahlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jacquot v. RozumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Jerauld County v. Huron Regional Medical Center, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
- Remington v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Remington v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025