Legal Opinion

Saiz v. Horn

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] This is an action brought by hom-ebuyers against their realtor. After their purchase, the buyers found that the home they bought had substantial defects. They also learned that the seller had previously given other potential buyers a disclosure statement revealing these defects. The buyers sued their realtor for breach of agency and breach of fiduciary duty in failing to inform them that the seller had a statutory duty to provide them with a disclosure statement. The trial court granted summary judgment for the realtor, finding no duty on the part of the buyers’…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Tipton v. Town of TaborSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Hurney v. LockeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Fisher v. KahlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Sorrels v. Queen of Peace HospitalSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jacquot v. RozumSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Jerauld County v. Huron Regional Medical Center, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Remington v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
  4. Remington v. IversonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API