Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Ratcliff

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 26, 1916No. 6811PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from District Court, Alfalfa County: James W. Steen, Judge. Action between Hank Duncan and others and Lillian Ratcliff. There was a judgment for tlie latter, and the former bring error.

1Per curiam

From the motion to dismiss filed herein by defendant in error, attached to which is the affidavit of the clerk of the district court, it appears that the judgment from which this appeal is prosecuted has been fully satisfied and discharged. Hence the questions presented here have ceased to exist and have become moot.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.'

2Cited by10 opinions

Stites v. DUIT Const. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
Grand River Dam Authority v. EatonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
Hart v. Jett Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
Wallace v. Boston Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
Stucki v. Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.