Legal Opinion
Melucci v. Eagan
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided September 16, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is the appeal of the complainants below from a decree of the court of chancery, after hearing, dismissing their bill which sought to enjoin the defendants from the maintenance of a private nuisance.
At the hearing before the vice-chancellor, to whom the case was referred, it appeared as we see it, without substantial dispute, among other things, that the complainants have owned and occupied a two-family house in the city of East Orange, New Jersey, and in a closely built residential neighborhood since 1922; that in 1932, the defendant Freytag purchased the property immediately adjoining…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Gilbough v. West Side Amusement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
- Kroecker v. Camden Coke Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
- Seligman v. Victor Talking Machine Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1906
- Wallace Tiernan Co. v. U.S. Cutlery Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
- Laird v. Atlantic Coast Sanitary Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Associated Metals, Etc., Corp. v. Dixon ChemicalNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945
- Hartman v. City of BrigantineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1957
- Protokowicz v. LesofskiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Inganamort v. MerkerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.