Legal Opinion
In re Harris-Intertype Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided June 30, 1975No. Patent Appeal No. 75-501PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Judge.
This appeal is from the. decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (one member dissenting), 182 USPQ 635 (1974), adhered to on reconsideration, affirming the examiner’s ex parte refusal to register “HARRIS” for “electronic equipment, namely — video display terminals for editing and proofing text preparatory to typesetting,” application serial No. 397,896, filed July 21, 1971, claiming first use in interstate commerce at least as early as June 6, 1970. We affirm.
Registration was refused by the examiner on the ground that “HARRIS” is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Automobile Club of Mich. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Automobile Club of Michigan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1956
- In re Kahan & Weisz Jewelry Mfg. Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lane Capital Management, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Lane Capital Management, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- In Re Etablissements Darty Et FileCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Hutchinson Technology IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- Texas International Property Associates v. Hoerbiger Holding AGDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2009
- IMAF, SPA v. JC Penney Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.