In re Kahan & Weisz Jewelry Mfg. Corp.
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
• This appeal is from the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board1 affirming the examiner’s refusal to register the mark DUCHARME2 as a trademark for watches on the Principar Register. We reverse.
The examiner refused registration under the Lanham Act, section 2(e)(3) (15 U.S.C. § 1052(e)(3)) on the ground that DUCHARME is primarily merely a surname. The board affirmed the refusal to register while adding, “[mjoreover, ‘DUCHARME’ is admittedly a surname *832and while it may well be, as applicant in substance contends, a rare surname, Section 2(e)(3) of the Statute makes no…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Application of Standard Elektrik Lorenz AktiengesellschaftCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lane Capital Management, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Lane Capital Management, Inc., Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Sidney Levine and Mpd Film Productions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- In Re Etablissements Darty Et FileCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Hutchinson Technology IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- In re Harris-Intertype Corp.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.