Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Peacock v. Latham

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided October 28, 1936PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

— In an original proceeding in mandamus the relator seeks to make effective the result and judgment obtained in the case of J. E. Peacock v. Latham, et al., in which opinions were filed on October 14th and October 22nd, 1936, respectively, by coercing the County Commissioners of Volusia County, Florida, to print official ballots to be used at the general election to be held on November 3, 1936, without the name of Thomas N. Tappy appearing thereon as candidate for the office of County Judge of Volusia County, Florida, and with the name of J. E. Peacock appearing thereon as the candidate…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Webster v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. State ex rel. Knott v. HaskellSupreme Court of Florida · 1916
  3. McConihe v. State, ex rel. McMurraySupreme Court of Florida · 1879
  4. State ex rel. Drew v. McLinSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  5. State Ex Rel. Gillespie v. County of BaySupreme Court of Florida · 1933

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnston v. IngHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Spradley v. BaileyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  3. Barber v. MoodyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Burke v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  5. Maxwell v. Good Samaritan Hospital Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API