Lombard Corporation v. Quality Aluminum Products Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALLEN, Chief Judge.
This appeal seeks reversal of a judgment of the District Court finding that defendant, 1 who sold to plaintiff an aluminum extrusion press, had breached the implied warranty of fitness under 1315.16(F), O.R.C., and awarding damages therefor.
The material facts are not in dispute and are as follows:
Defendant, a designer and builder of heavy equipment, in 1953 sold plaintiff a hydraulic aluminum extrusion press weighing about 85 tons and having a 1,-500 ton capacity. The reasonable or expected life of the machine was ten years. The amount paid was $114,494. The installation of…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- John A. Roebling's Sons Co. v. Southern Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1914
- J. B. Colt Co. v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Nat. Cash Reg. Co. v. Van Duser Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
3Cited by15 opinions
- S. M. Wilson & Company v. Smith International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Stearns v. Select Comfort Retail Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2010
- Cooley v. Big Horn Harvestore Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Galo Coba v. Ford Motor CoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
- Bruce Martin Construction, Inc. v. CTB, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.