Legal Opinion

Cote v. Bay State Gas Co.

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided September 1, 2004No. BRCV199801066Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarsh, J.

The parties seek a pre-trial ruling concerning the burden of proof in a contribution action with respect to the reasonableness of the underlying tort settlements.3 General Laws chapter 23 IB, Section 1(c) provides:

A tortfeasor who enters into a settlement with a claimant shall not be entitled to recover contribution from another tortfeasor in respect to any amount paid in a settlement which is in excess of what was reasonable.

This provision has been interpreted to place the burden of proof on the person seeking contribution to show that the settlement was reasonable. See Robertson v. McCarte,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Consolidated Coach Corporation v. BurgeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Home Ins. Co. v. Advance MacHine Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Noyes v. RaymondMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  4. City of Tucson v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Robertson v. McCarteMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API