Legal Opinion

Miller v. Brown

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Kalkaska; Aldrich, J. Bill by Cassius E. Miller against Frank E. Brown and John Sehler to quiet title. From a decree dismissing the bill, complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is a bill to quiet title: The bill was dismissed, and complainant appeals. The complainant claims under a tax deed from the auditor general for taxes of 1893, on a sale made under a decree rendered October 4, 1895. It is contended that the decree authorizing sale was unauthorized, for the reason that the owner was not allowed five days in term within which to present application for leave to file objections. The order fixed the day of hearing as September 24, 1895. The circuit judge was not present on that day, but sent an order to adjourn the court to Monday, the 30th, which was done.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McGinley v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Gates v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allen v. CowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Auditor General v. ShermanMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Goodell v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API