Legal Opinion

Auditor General v. Sherman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1904No. Docket No. 193PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Gogebic; Haire, J. Petition by Perry F. Powers, auditor general, for the sale of lands delinquent for taxes: On objections filed by James E. Sherman. From a decree for respondent, petitioner appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

This cause is before us on appeal from *158a circuit court decree rendered upon the annual petition of the auditor general for the foreclosure of tax liens, filed in January, 1903.

In 1901 the State was the apparent owner of all of the premises included in this case as State tax lands, covering taxes for the years from 1891 to 1899, inclusive. Becoming satisfied that some of these years’ proceedings could not be sustained, the auditor general canceled them for all years except for the taxes of 1891 to 1894, inclusive, §.nd obtained a new decree, and sold the lands under such decree to the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Peninsular Savings Bank v. WardMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McGinley v. Calumet & Hecla Mining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Auditor General v. NewmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Schulte v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Miller v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Adkin v. PillenMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Holmes v. SouleMichigan Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API