Legal Opinion
Planned Parenthood v. Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 18, 1983No. 82-5437PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Planned Parenthood instituted this suit to challenge the constitutionality of a footnote to an Arizona appropriation bill that forbade the expenditure of state social welfare funds to support nongovernmental organizations that perform abortions and engage in abortion-related activities. The district court, on a motion for summary judgment, declared the footnote unconstitutional and permanently enjoined its enforcement. Planned Parenthood of Central & Northern Arizona v. Arizona, 537 F.Supp. 90 (D.Ariz.1982). The State now appeals the summary judgment, the attorneys’ fee…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Warsoldier v. WoodfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Dkt Memorial Fund Ltd. v. Agency for International Development, Dkt Memorial Fund Ltd. v. Agency for International DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Jackson v. W.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
- N.A.A.C.P., Western Region v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.