Legal Opinion

Barrickman v. City of Louisville

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 5, 1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Jefferson Circuit Court (Common Pleas Branch No. 4).

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Turner

Affirming.

This is an action by appellant against the city of Louisville seeking damages for injuries received by her in falling over an obstruction in the driveway of Dum.esnil street in that city.

At the close of the plaintiff’s testimony the circuit court directed a verdict to be returned for the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The evidence discloses that on the night of the 27th of June, 1912, appellant with her husband and a party of friends left her home, further out on Dumesnil street, between seven-thirty and eight o’clock to attend a social…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Elam v. City of Mt. SterlingCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909
  2. Jones v. CollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1901
  3. City of Lawrenceburg v. LayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Myers v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  2. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. McClintock-Field Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  3. Savage v. Louisville Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1954
  4. Tegtmier v. City of CovingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API