Legal Opinion

Herbst v. Wuennenberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1978No. 75-841PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAbrahamson, J.

Carol Wuennenberg appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court on a jury’s special verdict finding that she falsely imprisoned Jason A. Herbst, Ronald B. Nadel, and Robert A. Ritholz (“plaintiffs”). Because there is no credible evidence to sustain a finding of false imprisonment, we reverse the judgment and order the cause remanded so that plain tiffs’ complaint can be dismissed and judgment entered in favor of Wuennenberg.

I

In April 1975, plaintiffs initiated a civil action charging Wuennenberg with false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process. Plaintiffs’ cause of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. May v. Skelley Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Maniaci v. Marquette UniversityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Maus v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Foseid v. State Bank of Cross PlainsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  2. Faniel v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Chicarelli v. Plymouth Garden ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Marquez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API