Herbst v. Wuennenberg
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAbrahamson, J.
Carol Wuennenberg appeals from a judgment entered by the trial court on a jury’s special verdict finding that she falsely imprisoned Jason A. Herbst, Ronald B. Nadel, and Robert A. Ritholz (“plaintiffs”). Because there is no credible evidence to sustain a finding of false imprisonment, we reverse the judgment and order the cause remanded so that plain tiffs’ complaint can be dismissed and judgment entered in favor of Wuennenberg.
I
In April 1975, plaintiffs initiated a civil action charging Wuennenberg with false imprisonment, malicious prosecution, and abuse of process. Plaintiffs’ cause of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- May v. Skelley Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Rodenkirch v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- Zweifel v. Milwaukee Automobile Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Maniaci v. Marquette UniversityWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
- Maus v. CookWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Foseid v. State Bank of Cross PlainsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Faniel v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Hart v. Seven Resorts Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Chicarelli v. Plymouth Garden ApartmentsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
- Marquez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.