Wells v. Moore
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Gonzales,, It appeared from a bill of exceptions, that the Court ruled out the bond, when offered in evidence by the plaintiff, on the ground that it was necessary for him first to prove that the alteration had not been made, as alleged by the defendants.
1Opinion of the CourtLipscomb, J.
This suit was brought by the appellant, as administrator de bonis non, against the. defendant as former administrator, and his securities for the administration. The case is very imperfectly presented. The petition is obnoxious to exceptions, but they were not taken in the Court below, and there is no statement of facts, and therefore many errors of the Court that we cannot revise, because, as the record is presented, we do not know their relevancy ; those, however, apparent upon the record, and those clearly presented by the Bill of Exceptions, we will notice.
In the first place the former…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Kalteyer v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1909
- Moore v. OrgainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
- Muckleroy v. BethanyTexas Supreme Court · 1864
- Kansas Mutual Life Insurance v. CoalsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1899
- Austin v. St. JohnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.