Legal Opinion

Tucker v. Scrushy

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided January 7, 2011No. 1090445PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHAW, Justice.

The plaintiffs below, Wade Tucker; the Wendell H. Cook, Sr., Testamentary Trust; John P. Cook; and HealthSouth Corporation (“the petitioners”), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Jefferson Circuit Court to vacate its order in favor of the law firm of Parkman, Adams & White, LLC (“Parkman”), quashing a subpoena seeking the production of documents and records held by Parkman reflecting payments made by or on behalf of Richard Scrushy.1 We grant the petition and issue the writ.

*752 Facts and Procedural History

On June 18, 2009, the Jefferson Circuit Court entered a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte the Boc Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  2. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte Dorsey Trailers, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  4. Home Ins. Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ex Parte AMI West Alabama General Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. The New York Times Company v. Kai Spears (Certified Question from the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama: 7:23-cv-00692-ACA).Supreme Court of Alabama · 2026
  2. Tucker v. ScrushySupreme Court of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API