Legal Opinion

Taverna v. Pizzi

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 8, 2000PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiff and the defendant were married on June 30, 1983. In September, 1984, the plaintiff filed a petition seeking a divorce under G. L. c. 208, § 1A, alleging an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. The petition was accompanied by the necessary affidavit attesting to the breakdown, and by an executed separation agreement, which provided that *883“[t]here have been no children bom of [the] marriage and there is no child in esse.” The separation agreement additionally provided that it was to be incorporated into, but not merged with, the judgment of divorce. A judge in the Probate and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Drapek v. DrapekMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
  2. Pare v. PareMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Wood v. WoodMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  4. Passemato v. PassematoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  5. Kirtz v. KirtzMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Santagate v. TowerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
  2. Krapf v. KrapfMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
  3. Bracci v. ChiccarelliMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001
  4. Ketterle v. KetterleMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Purdy v. ColangeloMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API