Legal Opinion
United States v. Rose
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided May 10, 2006No. 05-10447PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OWEN, Circuit Judge:
Following a jury trial, Daniel Rose was convicted of conspiring to “suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the price, rigging bids, and allocating customers for choline chloride sold in the United States[,]” in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act. 1 Rose appeals his conviction, asserting insufficiency of the evidence, and challenges his sentence based on the district court’s findings regarding the volume of commerce affected by the offense and Rose’s alleged role as a manager or supervisor. Because the evidence is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict, we…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. VillanuevaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Amy Ralston Pofahl, Charles T. Nunn, and Randy WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. JaramilloCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. NavaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Thomas Malone, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. GreenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Kendrick AkinsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Lia St. JuniusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.