United States v. Watt
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
SENTENCING MEMORANDUM
GERTNER, District Judge.
This case concerns what is reported to be the largest conspiracy to commit identity theft in American history. The defendant, Stephen Watt (“Watt”), played a unique role in the conspiracy, unique, that is, for run of the mill fraud crimes before the advent of the Internet. He adapted certain software that enabled the principals of the conspiracy to extract information from a number of companies, but he received no money for his work. He did it for the challenge, for the thrill of besting large institutions. But whatever the motive, however…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Ben Renfro StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. EmmeneggerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- United States v. ParrisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- United States v. CostelloDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- United States v. Marti-LonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sandra Calkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Sandra Calkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. AbbasCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2026
- United States v. James FryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. James FryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015