Legal Opinion

Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. Salazar

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 17, 2011No. Mise. No. 08-764 (EGS); MDL Docket No. 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.

On May 15, 2008, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“the Service” or “the agency”) published its final rule listing the polar bear as a threatened species under the Endangered Species Act (“ESA”). See Determination of Threatened Status for the Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus) Throughout Its Range, 73 Fed. Reg. 28,-212 (May 15, 2008) (“Listing Rule”). This Court recently upheld the Listing Rule as a reasonable exercise of agency discretion. See generally In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and § U(d,) Rule Litigation, 794 F.Supp.2d…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act ListingDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API