Legal Opinion
Rosenow v. Alltel Corp.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided January 21, 2010No. 09-463PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DONALD L. CORBIN, Justice.
Appellant Peter Rosenow, individually, and on behalf of a class of similarly situated persons, appeals the order of the Saline County Circuit Court denying his motion for class certification. On appeal, Appellant argues that the circuit court abused its discretion (1) by denying class certification on the basis that the elements of commonality, predominance, and superiority could not be satisfied; and (2) by denying his motion to strike the expert opinion of Dr. Jerry A. Hausman, regarding the calculation of potential damages incurred by Appellees. This court assumed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
- Fraley v. Williams Ford Tractor & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- TERIS, LLC v. ChandlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- General Motors Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- SIMPSON HOUSING SOLUTIONS, LLC. v. HernandezSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. MurraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
- Diamante, LLC v. DyeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Arkansas Department of Veterans Affairs v. OkekeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
- Alltel Corp. v. RosenowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- GGNSC Arkadelphia, LLC v. LambSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.