Legal Opinion

Reese v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided September 29, 1983No. 82-1004PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Associate Judge, Retired:

Appellant was convicted by a jury of first-degree murder while armed 1 and carrying a pistol without a license. 2 On appeal, he claims he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to the compulsory process of witnesses because of (1) the prosecutor’s alleged intimidation of an alibi witness who thereafter refused to testify; (2) the trial court’s decision to permit two of his witnesses to invoke blanket privileges against self-incrimination; and (3) the court’s alleged intimidation of a third witness which deterred him from testifying. Appellant also claims a…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  4. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. King v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Graves v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Taylor v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Henderson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API