Legal Opinion

Wilson v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1989No. 86-339PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWELB, Associate Judge:

This case presents a collision between the right of a criminal defendant to call a witness in his own defense and the privilege of that witness not to incriminate himself. Appellant Leon A. Wilson asks us to set aside his conviction of taking property without right (TPWR) in violation of D.C. Code § 22-3816 (1987 Supp.). He contends that the trial judge committed reversible error by sustaining a blanket invocation of the privilege against self-incrimination by a prospective defense witness, Samuel Lee, and by permitting Lee not to take the witness stand at all, thus…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kastigar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  4. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Michigan v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Carter v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Martin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Sykes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Medrano-Quiroz v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Littlejohn v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API