Legal Opinion

Woodard v. Gramlow

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided July 8, 2004No. 22039-7-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

After disputes arose concerning the administration of Charlene Young’s estate, James Woodard was appointed by the court to be the personal representative (PR). The main source of controversy is a life insurance policy that named Jacqueline Gramlow, the decedent’s half sister, as the sole beneficiary. Although Ms. Young died testate, her will was inartfully drafted by Ms. Gramlow, who is not an attorney. In an attempt to settle the estate, the PR asked the court to determine the rights of the parties by interpreting certain documents. The trial court ultimately found that the will created a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  2. King v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. King v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Matter of Estate of PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Baarslag v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Patterson v. RosaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. In Re The Estate Of Constance E. Little Roxanne Trees, Res. v. Renae Roberson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. Woodard v. GramlowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  5. In Re The Estate Of: Michael James Scott, Jr. And Nadine Irene ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API