Legal Opinion
Woodard v. Gramlow
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 17, 2004No. 22039-7-IIIPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
95 P.3d 1244 (2004)
James V. WOODARD, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Charlene Young, Respondent,
v.
Jacqueline GRAMLOW, Appellant,
David J. Young, Respondent,
Kim McDonald, Dennis Coplen, Michelle Eldore, Heather May, Chad Coplen, and The Grandchildren of Charlene Young, Defendants.
No. 22039-7-III.
Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Five.
July 8, 2004.
Publication Ordered August 17, 2004.
Thomas M. Smith, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, for Appellant.
James V. Woodard, Attorney at Law, Spokane, WA, Douglas D. Lambarth, Lambarth Law Office, Newport, WA, for Respondents.
SCHULTHEI…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Estate of BergauWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- King v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- King v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Matter of Estate of PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Baarslag v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of WrightCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Patterson v. RosaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In Re The Estate Of Constance E. Little Roxanne Trees, Res. v. Renae Roberson, App.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
- In Re The Estate Of: Michael James Scott, Jr. And Nadine Irene ScottCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019