Legal Opinion

Doe v. American Red Cross

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 11, 1994No. 9010-06734; CA A74444PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeeson, J.

Plaintiff brought this action, individually and as the personal representative of her husband’s estate, for allegedly tortious transmission of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) by a blood transfusion. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on the ground that the action was time barred. We review the record in the light most favorable to plaintiff to determine whether there is any genuine question of material fact, and whether defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Park v. Hoffard, 315 Or 624, 847 P2d 852 (1993). We reverse.

On March 7,1985, during…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gaston v. ParsonsOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Park v. HoffardOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Doe v. American National Red CrossWisconsin Supreme Court · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Doe v. American Red CrossOregon Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Waage v. Cutter Biological Division of Miles Laboratories, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API