Legal Opinion

Newby v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1957No. 33826PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, J.

In October, 1953, the Douglas County Memorial Hospital Association commenced an action against Joe Newby to recover the sum of $592.76 under an express contract. In the course of the action, .the hospital attached Mr. Newby’s automobile. The ground set forth in the affidavit for the attachment was: “To recover on a contract express or implied.” In the above-mentioned action, the trial court awarded'judgment to the hospital. On Newby’s appeal to this court (Douglas County Memorial Hospital Ass’n v. Newby, 45 Wn. (2d) 784, 278 P. (2d) 330), the judgment was reversed and the cause remanded with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McGill v. W. P. Fuller & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Levy v. Fleischner, Mayer & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Brown v. Guaranty Estates Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Taylor v. WilburWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  5. Douglas County Memorial Hospital Ass'n v. NewbyWashington Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wagner Development, Inc. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
  2. Coggins v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  3. Tri-State Development, Ltd. v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 11,267, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 12,271 Tri-State Development, Ltd., a Washington Corporation v. David A. Johnston Gayle Johnston John H. Shields, Pierce County Sheriff, Attorney General of the State of Washington, Defendant-IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Newby v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API