O'Brien's Case
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.
The claimant, Barbara O’Brien, asserts that G. L. c. 152, § 11A (2), as appearing in St. 1991, c. 398, § 30, on its face denies a party to a workers’ compensation dispute due process of law insofar as it denies the opportunity to offer as *17of right medical testimony to contradict the report of the impartial medical examiner in the appeal from a conference order. We conclude that § 11A (2) is not unconstitutional on its face.
I
The claimant claimed to have suffered an industrial accident in respect to which the insurer paid weekly incapacity benefits for some six weeks but without prejudice to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wellesley College v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Aime v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
- Leibovich v. AntonellisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coggin v. Massachusetts Parole BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1997
- Adoption of EdmundMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Patterson v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2000
- Vranos v. SkinnerMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2010
- Levy v. Acting GovernorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.