Legal Opinion

State v. Stevens

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 2014No. 2012-2003 and 2012-2006PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Neill, J.

{¶ 1} Appellants, Zachary Bondurant and Jeffrey Stevens, were involved in the sale of drugs in Highland County from late 2010 until early 2011. Although the total amount of money involved in the sales attributed to each appellant was $460 and $250 respectively, they were both charged with engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity under R.C. 2923.32. Bondurant received a mandatory sentence of seven years for violating that statute, plus additional time for other drug-related convictions. Stevens received a mandatory sentence of nine years for violating that statute, plus additional time for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. SantosSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Rewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  4. State v. ElmoreOhio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. BondurantOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. Dent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  2. State v. KirkpatrickOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  3. Bradley v. MillerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2015
  4. State v. CassellOhio Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. DonaldsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API