Foster v. Foster
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
In this divorce case all of the issues concern the division of the parties’ property. Appellant, James Foster, contends that the court made a number of errors which, taken together, have resulted in a division of property grossly skewed in favor of the appellee, Evelynn Foster. We conclude that some of the court’s findings are erroneous, that additional findings are needed, and that no judgment concerning whether the overall division of marital property was clearly unjust can be made until the erroneous findings are corrected and the necessary additional findings are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ogard v. OgardAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Laing v. LaingAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- Hartland v. HartlandAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
- Sheppard v. SheppardIdaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Jones v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Beals v. BealsAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Odom v. OdomAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Jones v. JonesAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Lundquist v. LundquistAlaska Supreme Court · 1996
- Ethelbah v. WalkerAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.