Legal Opinion

In re Central New York Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1899PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by Margaret Woods and others, the property owners in the above-entitled proceeding, from that part of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the St. Lawrence Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of St. Lawrence on the 6th day of June, 1898, upon the report of commissioners appointed to assess damages under the Condemnation Law, which modifies the report of said commissioners by reducing the award to the sum of thirteen dollars.

Read the full summary

Appeal by Margaret Woods and others, the property owners in the above-entitled proceeding, from that part of an order of the Supreme Court, made at the St. Lawrence Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of St. Lawrence on the 6th day of June, 1898, upon the report of commissioners appointed to assess damages under the Condemnation Law, which modifies the report of said commissioners by reducing the award to the sum of thirteen dollars. Also an appeal by the petitioner, the Central New York Telephone and Telegraph Company, from so much of said order as awards costs…

1Per curiam

When the defendants against whom these condemnation proceedings were prosecuted, applied to the Special Term for an order confirming the report made by two of the commissioners, the court made the order in the following terms: “ It is ordered and

adjudged that said report be in all things confirmed, except as to the award of damages, and in that regard, that said award be modified to the sum of thirteen dollars, the award made being deemed excessive.”

Such was the whole of the order, except that part allowing costs to the defendants against the plaintiff. '

The defendants have appealed from so…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re the Town of GuilfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  2. In re New York, Westchester & Boston Railway Co.New York Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Claim of Johns v. Village of SalamancaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  4. Guilford v. BradburyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  5. In re the Board of Supervisors of the County of Warren to Secure the Requisite Rights of Way for the Hague-Ticonderoga County Highway No. 2823, New York County Courts1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API