Legal Opinion

Gladding v. Saint Matthew's Church

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided February 3, 1904PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Bill in Equity to obtain construction of a will.

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This bill is brought by the trustees under the will of Sarah Emeline Acly, to obtain a construction of the will. The adverse parties in interest are The Rector, Church Wardens, and Vestrymen of Saint Matthew’s Church, in the City of New York, a corporation created under the laws of the State of New York, on the one hand, and Joseph C. Sweeney, administrator upon the estate of Albert J. Acly and Horace Hurlbutt, Jr. (the said Acly and Hurlbutt having been the sole heirs-at-law and next of kin of the testatrix at the time of her death), on the other.

The case was heard upon bill and answers,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Shields v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Railroad Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. Clearwater v. MeredithSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Railroad Co. v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Duncan v. HigginsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942
  2. McBride v. MurphyCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1924
  3. Murphy v. McBrideSupreme Court of Delaware · 1925
  4. Snow v. President of Bowdoin CollegeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
  5. Industrial National Bank v. Glocester Manton Free Public LibrarySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API