Legal Opinion

Simonson Cashway Co. v. Merickel Construction Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 12, 1986No. C6-86-64PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is a mechanics’ lien foreclosure action by Boutin Plumbing & Heating (Bout-in) and Richard Kampa Construction (Kam-pa) involving real estate owned initially by Merickel Construction Company (Merickel) but purchased during the litigation by respondent Simonson Cashway Company (Si-monson), itself a contractor with a mechanic’s lien foreclosure action. That purchase merged the interests of Simonson and Mer-ickel. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of Simonson, thereby preventing enforcement of appellants’ mechanics’ liens. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Meric…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Nor-Son, Inc. v. NordellCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  2. Northwest Wholesale Lumber, Inc. v. Citadel Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
  3. PJ Acquisition Corp. v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. PJ Acquisition Corp. v. SkoglundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API