Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State v. Prince

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 18, 1988No. 88-0540-CRPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLaROCQUE, J.

James Prince appeals an order denying his motion for a sentence modification based on a new factor. Because we conclude that a post-sentence finding that Prince’s sexually deviant behavior was treatable is not a new factor, we affirm.

Prince was convicted of one count of first-degree sexual assault, contrary to sec. 940.225(l)(a), Stats. A presentence report contained two psychological analy-ses of Prince. One recommended that Prince receive treatment for psychiatric and psychological problems, rather than incarceration. The other reported that Prince was not presently treatable because of his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. HegwoodWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. KruegerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  4. State v. LarsenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. CrochiereWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. KluckWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. ChampionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  4. State v. TrujilloWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. KluckCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API