Legal Opinion

State v. Champion

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided October 31, 2002No. 01-1894-CRPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.

¶ 1. Dawn M. Champion appeals an order denying her motion for sentence modification. Champion was sentenced under truth-in-sentencing. Champion argues that events relating to her rehabilitation while in confinement constitute a new sentencing factor, thereby making her eligible for sentence modification. We conclude that events subsequent to sentencing and relating to rehabilitation do not constitute a new sentencing factor, and affirm the circuit court.

Background

¶ 2. Champion pled guilty to the crime of causing great bodily harm by the operation of a vehicle while under the influence of an…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Kollasch v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HarborWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
  2. State v. StenklyftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. State v. CrochiereWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State v. LongmireCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  5. State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API