State v. Champion
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtLundsten, J.
¶ 1. Dawn M. Champion appeals an order denying her motion for sentence modification. Champion was sentenced under truth-in-sentencing. Champion argues that events relating to her rehabilitation while in confinement constitute a new sentencing factor, thereby making her eligible for sentence modification. We conclude that events subsequent to sentencing and relating to rehabilitation do not constitute a new sentencing factor, and affirm the circuit court.
Background
¶ 2. Champion pled guilty to the crime of causing great bodily harm by the operation of a vehicle while under the influence of an…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Kollasch v. AdamanyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. SetagordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- Kelley Co., Inc. v. MarquardtWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Rosado v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. HarborWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. StenklyftWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. CrochiereWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. LongmireCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
- State v. TorresCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.