Legal Opinion

E. R. Beyer Lumber Co. v. Brooks

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 1969No. 24PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

The issues in this case revolve around the status of the defendant when he signed the promissory note of October 17, 1960. Since the transaction was entered into prior to passage of the Uniform Commercial Code, “the rights, duties and interests flowing from them remain valid thereafter and may be terminated, completed, consummated or enforced as required or permitted by any statute amended or repealed by chapter 158, laws of 1963, as though such repeal or amendment had not occurred.” Sec. 401.110 (1) (a), Stats.

Wisconsin cases interpreting the applicable statutes 1 have held that an…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Schoenwetter v. SchoenwetterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Miley v. HeaneyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Rosendale State Bank v. HollandWisconsin Supreme Court · 1928
  4. James Employees Credit Union v. HawleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Irvine v. AdamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Estate of MolayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API