State Ex Rel. City of Okmulgee v. Moroney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1DissentKornegay, J.
I cannot assent to the doctrine of the majority. Its effect is too disastrous, as I view it, to the general welfare of the state. Its example to propagandists and self-servers elsewhere is alluring. The opinion is founded on the sands of the “Bodine Case,” rather than upon the rock of the Constitution. It is but a step, though rather a long one, in “judicial legislation” that appears at times to obsess the minds of courts of last resort. This might aptly be termed an “ego complex,” with a parting gesture, were it not, in fact, an usurpation, the ultimate effect, if not cheeked, being…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Metropolis Theater Company, Plffs. In Err. v. City of Chicago and Ernest J. MagerstadtSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- People Ex Rel. Metropolitan Street Railway Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- City of Sapulpa v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Oklahoma News Co. v. RyanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Owen v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.