Legal Opinion

Rester v. Moody & Stewart

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided October 8, 1930No. 678PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Henry E. Rester sold and delivered to Moody & Stewart motortruck material, such as parts, tires, grease, etc., *178in .amount $154.16, and same was by them used in the repair and operation of motortrúéks.' The 'trucks* were in turn used by them, in the construction of that portion of the. Sun-Bogalusa State Line Highway, which runs through the Fourth ward of Washington parish, and for which the said Moody & Stewart were contractors under the Louisiana Highway Commission. Their said contract obliged them to give a statutory bond, pursuant to the laws of this state on the subject. Union Indemnity…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Red River Const. Co. v. Pierce Petroleum CorporationSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
  3. Bowers v. Orleans Producing & Refining Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. Nelson v. Continental Asphalt & Petroleum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rester v. Moody & StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931
  2. General Lumber & Supply Co. v. HunterLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. Rester v. Moody & StewartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API