Sharp v. Wellmark, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAM A. CROW, Senior District Judge.
This removed case, which seeks only interest, comes before the court on the Sharps’ motion to remand the case to state court. The Sharps believe the. court lacks federal jurisdiction over their case, which seeks interest under Kansas law on Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) benefits which Wellmark previously paid to the Sharps pursuant to the parties’ settlement agreement in a previous case.
Background
Several prior cases have been filed relating to this matter. The Sharps filed the underlying case seeking ERISA benefits from…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Aetna Health Inc. v. DavilaSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Keller v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Carlile v. Reliance Standard Life InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2024