Legal Opinion

United States v. Zabawa

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 7, 2005No. 03-2592, 04-1115, 04-1282UnpublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Defendant Philip Zabawa appeals his conviction for being a felon in possession of a firearm, assigning as error the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. The United States cross-appeals the district court’s ruling that Zabawa is not an “armed career criminal” for the purposes of the Armed Career Criminal Act (“ACCA”), 18 U.S.C. § 924(e) and the district court’s amended judgment specifying that Zabawa’s federal sentence should run concurrently with previously imposed state sentences. Because the police officers who seized the evidence entered…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. PensonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  2. United States v. WalkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  3. Simon v. Amir (In Re Amir)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2010
  4. United States v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Holifield v. United States of America (INMATE 3)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API