Legal Opinion
Harrison v. Aztec Well Servicing Co
District Court, N.D. Texas
Decided January 13, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00038Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS ABILENE DIVISION STACEY HARRISON, et al., Plaintiffs, v. No. 1:20-CV-038-H AZTEC WELL SERVICING CO., INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO STRIKE THE EXPERT WITNESSES Trial approaches. The parties designated experts to testify on damages. Each side has moved to strike the other’s expert. Both motions are denied in part and granted in part. The bulk of the damages the plaintiff seeks to recover seems to stem from the demise of a planned well-development partnership with a group of investors, Tri-Capital.…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Thomas Pipitone, and Bonnie Pipitone v. Biomatrix, Inc., Biomatrix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.